TAX CONTROVERSY 360

“Big, Beautiful Bill”: Federal Tax Bill Would Restrict the Employee Retention Credit

by Shawn O’Brien, Samuel F. Hamer and Michael J. Scarduzio | May 20, 2025 | Tax Reform

A sweeping federal tax bill that is currently under consideration in the US House of Representatives contains provisions that would significantly change the administration and enforcement of the Employee Retention Credit (ERC).

The ERC was enacted in 2020 as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to provide financial relief to businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic by incentivizing employers to retain employees on payroll and rehire displaced workers. The ERC allowed employers that experienced significant disruptions due to government orders or a substantial decline in gross receipts to claim a tax credit equal to a percentage of qualified wages paid to employees. Millions of employers have filed refund claims seeking ERC for periods in 2020 and 2021. Since the enactment of the CARES Act, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued roughly $250 billion in ERC. More than 500,000 claims remained pending as of April 2025.

The federal tax bill, dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill” by US President Donald Trump, would prevent the IRS from allowing ERC that was claimed by a taxpayer on or before January 31, 2024. The deadline to claim ERC for taxable quarters in 2020 was April 15, 2024, and the deadline to claim ERC for taxable quarters in 2021 was April 15, 2025. The tax bill would thus appear to render ineligible all pending claims that were made after January 31, 2024, which are likely to be considerable in number. The bill is ambiguous as to whether taxpayers who have already been allowed ERC would need to repay those amounts to the extent their claims were made after January 31, 2024.

The tax bill would also extend the statute of limitations on the IRS’s ability to assess amounts attributable to ERC. Presently, the IRS has three years to assess amounts associated with ERC for all periods in 2020 and for Q1 and Q2 of 2021. The IRS has five years to assess amounts associated with ERC for Q3 and Q4 of 2021. The proposed legislation would extend both of these limitations periods to six years. This change would be significant, especially because the IRS is authorized to assess and collect erroneously allowed ERC by notice and demand.

Practice Point: Taxpayers with pending ERC claims should be alert to ongoing legislative developments – as this area continues to be a prominent focus of federal tax policy – and prepare now to defend ERC claims (even those filed after the potentially new deadline of January 31, 2024). Enactment of the changes proposed in the tax bill could dramatically restrict the amount of ERC currently eligible to be paid or credited and may empower the IRS to recapture a greater amount of claims already allowed. But considerable uncertainties remain as to the scope of the changes proposed in the bill. In the face of this uncertainty, taxpayers should consult experienced counsel who can assist them in preparing to defend ERC claims to which they are entitled.

IRS Roundup May 2 – May 13, 2025

by Evan Walters, Samuel F. Hamer, Edward L. Froelich, Michael J. Scarduzio and Matthew J. Blaney | May 19, 2025 | IRS Guidance, Tax Reform

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for May 2, 2025 – May 13, 2025.

IRS GUIDANCE

May 2, 2025: The IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2025-20, providing guidance on the domestic asset/liability percentages and domestic investment yields used by foreign life insurance companies and foreign property and liability insurance companies to compute their minimum effectively connected net investment income under Section 842(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023.

May 5, 2025: The IRS released Internal Revenue Bulletin 2025-19, which includes Revenue Ruling 2025-10 and Revenue Procedure 2025-18.

Revenue Ruling 2025-10 provides various prescribed rates for federal income tax purposes for May 2025, including:

The short-, mid-, and long-term applicable federal rates for purposes of Code Section 1274(d).
The short-, mid-, and long-term adjusted applicable federal rates for purposes of Code Section 1288(b).
The adjusted federal long-term rate and the long-term tax-exempt rate from Code Section 382(f).
The appropriate percentages for determining the low-income housing credit from Code Section 42(b)(1) (but only for buildings placed in service during May 2025).
The federal rate for determining the present value of an annuity, an interest for life or for a term of years, or a remainder or a reversionary interest for purposes of Code Section 752.

Revenue Procedure 2025-18 provides issuers of qualified mortgage bonds (defined in Code Section 143(a)) and mortgage credit certificates (defined in Code Section 25(c)) with guidance related to nationwide purchase prices for residences, as well as the average area purchase price for residences located in statistical areas in each US state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.

May 6, 2025: The IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2025-21, modifying Section 12 of Revenue Procedure 2024-32.

Executive Order 14219, issued through the Department of Government Efficiency’s deregulatory initiative, directed agencies to initiate a review process for identification and removal of certain regulations and guidance. Pursuant to Executive Order 14219, the US Department of the Treasury and the IRS identified Section 12 of Revenue Procedure 2024-32 as a regulation needing modification.

Revenue Procedure 2024-32 specifies the procedure by which the sponsor of a defined benefit plan, which is subject to the funding requirements of Code Section 430, may request approval from the IRS for the use of plan-specific substitute mortality tables. Section 12.02 of Revenue Procedure 2024-32 specifies that if a plan sponsor wishes to use plan-specific mortality tables, it must develop and request approval for the use of new plan-specific mortality tables for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. Revenue Procedure 2025-21 provides immediate relief for some of those plan sponsors by narrowing the category of plan sponsors that must request approval of new plan-specific substitute mortality tables.

May 12, 2025: The IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2025-11, determining the interest rates [...]

Continue Reading

IRS Roundup April 1 – April 17, 2025

by Evan Walters, Samuel F. Hamer, Edward L. Froelich, Michael J. Scarduzio and Matthew J. Blaney | May 1, 2025 | IRS Guidance, Tax Reform

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for April 1, 2025 – April 17, 2025.

April 4, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2025-19, inviting the public to submit recommendations for items to include in the IRS’s 2025-2026 Priority Guidance Plan. The IRS uses the Priority Guidance Plan to identify and prioritize the tax issues that should be addressed via regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and other published administrative guidance. A list of factors the IRS considers when selecting projects for inclusion is outlined in the notice.

April 9, 2025: The US Department of the Treasury (Treasury), along with the IRS and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, eliminated 15 rules and guidance materials, in addition to two rules already rescinded by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The stated purpose of these actions was to remove rules that the government says are now obsolete and hamper the growth of US small businesses. These actions were some of the many that the Treasury says it will take over the next several months to eliminate unnecessary IRS rules and to “unleash the regulated banking sector.”

April 10, 2025: US President Donald Trump signed legislation blocking an IRS reporting rule that would have required decentralized digital asset platforms to report statistics showing customers’ gross sales on their platforms.

April 11, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2025-24, providing penalty relief under Section 6707A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code to participants in micro-captive reportable transactions that fail to timely file (i.e., by April 14, 2025) certain disclosure statements as required under Section 6011; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.6011-10(h)(2) or 1.6011-11(h)(2); Section 6111; and Treas. Reg. §§ 1.6011-10(h)(3) or 1.6011-11(h)(3)). Participants will only qualify for relief if they file the required disclosure statement with the Office of Tax Shelter Analysis by July 31, 2025.

April 14, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2025-22, providing for the elimination of extraneous and unnecessary Internal Revenue Bulletin guidance. This notice was prompted by the issuance of Executive Order 14219 on February 19, 2025. The purpose of Executive Order 14219 is to focus the IRS’s limited enforcement resources on regulations “squarely authorized by constitutional Federal statutes” while eliminating “overbearing and burdensome” regulations and “ending Federal overreach.” In Notice 2025-22, the IRS eliminated several current sources of guidance and stated that it anticipates revoking or obsoleting hundreds of similar guidance documents in the near future.

April 15, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2025-21, providing updates on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, spot segment rates used under § 417(e)(3), and the 24-month average segment rates under § 430(h)(2) of the Code. This notice also provides guidance on the interest rates for 30-year Treasury securities and the 30-year Treasury weighted average for plan years beginning before 2008.

April 17, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2025-23, announcing its intent to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking, proposing [...]

Continue Reading

The Employee Retention Credit: IRS’s “Risking” Model Faces Legal Challenge

by Shawn O’Brien, Samuel F. Hamer and Michael J. Scarduzio | Apr 24, 2025 | Court Procedure Matters, IRS Appeals, Trial Courts

Case: ERC Today LLC et al. v. John McInelly et al., No. 2:24-cv-03178 (D. Ariz.)

In an April 2025 order, the US District Court for the District of Arizona denied a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by two tax preparation firms. The firms sought to halt the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) use of an automated “risk assessment model” that the IRS used to evaluate and disallow claims for the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), seeking to restore individualized review of ERC claims.

BACKGROUND ON THE ERC

The ERC was enacted in 2020 as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to provide financial relief to businesses affected by COVID-19 by incentivizing employers to retain employees and rehire displaced workers. The ERC allowed employers that experienced significant disruptions due to government orders or a substantial decline in gross receipts to claim a tax credit equal to a percentage of qualified wages paid to employees. Millions of employers have filed amended employment tax returns (Form 941-X) claiming the credit for periods in 2020 and 2021. Since the enactment of the CARES Act, the IRS has issued roughly $250 billion in ERC.

THE IRS’S MORATORIUM AND AUTOMATED RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL

In September 2023, the IRS instituted a moratorium on processing ERC claims to review its procedures, reduce the backlog of claims, and identify potential fraud. Before the moratorium, all ERC claims received individualized review. During the moratorium, the IRS developed an automated “risk assessment model” to facilitate the processing of claims. This model, which is alternatively known as “risking,” utilizes taxpayer-submitted data and publicly available information to predict the likelihood that a taxpayer’s claim is valid or invalid. Claims deemed to be “high risk” by the system are excluded from review by an IRS employee and instead are designated for immediate disallowance. In August 2024, the IRS lifted its ERC processing moratorium and began issuing thousands of disallowance notices to taxpayers. Notwithstanding these actions, the number of pending ERC claims remained above one million as of November 2024.

THE COURT CHALLENGE TO THE IRS’S “RISKING” MODEL

In their motion for a preliminary injunction, filed January 7, 2025, the plaintiffs (the tax preparation firms) sought a court order compelling the IRS to, among other things, stop the use of “risking” and restore individualized employee review of ERC claims. The plaintiffs claimed to be injured by the “risking” model because they were unable to collect contingency fees from clients when claims were disallowed.

In support of their motion, the plaintiffs pointed to having received on behalf of their clients many boilerplate rejections immediately following the end of the moratorium. The plaintiffs alleged that these summary disallowances were arbitrary and capricious, thus violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), because the “risking” model precluded the IRS from acquiring information necessary to properly evaluate the claims.[1] The plaintiffs also contended that the disallowances reflected a shift in IRS policy to disfavor ERC, with the result being that several legitimate claims were being [...]

Continue Reading

The Employee Retention Credit: How to Litigate and Resolve Claims

by Shawn O’Brien, Michael J. Scarduzio and Samuel F. Hamer | Apr 10, 2025 | IRS Appeals

The Employee Retention Credit (ERC) was designed to help employers keep their employees on payroll during the COVID-19 pandemic by offering a refundable tax credit against certain employment taxes. Despite the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issuing more than $242 billion in ERC as of early 2025, the processing and payment of these claims have faced significant delays and scrutiny.

In a recent Bloomberg Tax article, McDermott’s tax controversy and litigation team shared a broad overview of the stages of ERC claims and potential ways in which taxpayers can resolve them. Key takeaways include:

ERC claims can be in one of four stages: no IRS action, IRS examination, formal disallowance, or IRS recapture. Understanding the implications of each stage can be crucial for maximizing taxpayers’ chances of receiving and keeping ERC.
Thousands of ERC claims remain stagnated in the IRS’s administrative review process. Litigation can be a powerful tool to expedite the payment of ERC claims.
Taxpayers must be highly vigilant about the applicable statutes of limitations concerning ERC refund claims. Not understanding these deadlines can undermine the potential for a successful ERC claim.
The IRS is capable of recapturing ERC that it believes was erroneously allowed. However, the mechanisms for recapture may be susceptible to legal challenge, and taxpayers should be aware of their litigation options.

Read the full article.