IRS Publishes IPU on Penalties for Failure to Report Transfer of Property to a Foreign Corporation

By and on June 16, 2016

On June 14, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) published an International Practice Unit (IPU) on the monetary penalty for failing to file Form 926, Return by a U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation (available here).  Under IRC section 6038B(a)(1)(A), a US person who transfers property to a foreign corporation in an exchange described in IRC sections 332, 351, 354, 355 or 361 is required to file Form 926 and accompanying information with the IRS.  The Form 926 and accompanying information must be filed with the US person’s income tax return for the taxable year that includes the date of the transfer.

Failure to comply with the reporting requirements (e.g., failure to timely file a Form 926 or providing false or inaccurate information) can result in a penalty equal to 10 percent of the fair market value of the transferred property for which there was a failure to comply, up to $100,000.  However, the penalty is not limited if the failure to furnish was due to intentional disregard.  The penalty may be waived if the US person demonstrates that the failure to comply was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect.  If there is a failure to comply, the statute of limitations on assessment of tax for the year of noncompliance potentially remains open until three years after the date on which the required information is provided.

The IPU contains detailed instructions to IRS revenue agents for purposes of examining this issue and determining whether to assert a penalty.  In our experience, the IRS in recent years has been more aggressive in asserting penalties for failure to comply with information reporting requirements and has imposed a heavy burden on taxpayers to demonstrate that the reasonable cause exception applies.  This IPU states that additional IPUs on information reporting penalties in other situations (e.g., failure to file Form 5471, issues associated with offshore bank accounts and check-the-box rules for foreign entities) will be forthcoming.  Given the increased focus on penalties in this area and statute of limitations issues, taxpayers subject to these information reporting requirements should ensure that they are complying with the IRS rules in this area.

Andrew R. Roberson
Andrew (Andy) R. Roberson focuses his practice on tax controversy and litigation matters. He represents clients before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Examination Division and Appeals Office and has been involved in over 75 matters at all levels of the federal court system, including the US Tax Court and Federal District Courts, several US Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Andy has experience settling tax disputes through alternative dispute resolution procedures, including Fast Track Settlement and Post-Appeals Mediation, and in representing clients in Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) audits. In addition to representing corporations and partnerships in tax disputes, he also represents high net-worth individuals and assists taxpayers needing to make voluntary disclosures. Read Andy Roberson's full bio.


Roger J. Jones
    Roger J. Jones represents clients in tax controversy and litigation matters at all levels of the federal court system, before the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and before various state courts and tax agencies. He has represented taxpayers, including numerous Fortune 500 companies, in more than 80 docketed cases before the US Supreme Court, most of the US courts of appeals, federal district courts, the US Court of Federal Claims and the US Tax Court. Read Roger Jones' full bio.

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES