Tax Refunds
Subscribe to Tax Refunds's Posts

IRS roundup: December 15 – December 22, 2025

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for December 15, 2025 – December 22, 2025. 

December 15, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2026-2, providing an update on weighted average interest rates, yield curves, and segment rates. The notice specifically focused on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, corresponding spot segment rates used for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 417(e)(3), and 24-month average segment rates for purposes of Code Section 430(h)(2). Notice 2026-2 also provides the interest rate for 30-year Treasury securities for purposes of Code Section 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II), as in effect for plan years beginning before 2008, as well as the 30-year Treasury weighted average rate for purposes of Code Section 431(c)(6)(E)(ii)(I).

December 15, 2025: The IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2026-2, providing various prescribed rates for federal income tax purposes for January 2026. The prescribed rates include:

  • Short-, mid-, and long-term applicable federal rates for certain debt instruments in the Code.
  • Section 42(b)(1) housing credit appropriate percentages.
  • The deemed rate of return for calendar year 2026 transfers made to pooled income funds, as described in Section 642(c)(5).
  • The average of the applicable federal mid-term rates for the 60-month period ending December 31, 2025.

December 19, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2026-1, providing interim guidance related to the credit for carbon oxide sequestration under Code Section 45Q pending the forthcoming proposed regulations removing reporting obligations related to the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide imposed under subpart RR of 40 CFR part 98. The notice specifically provides a safe harbor for determining eligibility for qualified carbon oxide, captured and disposed of in secure geological storage and not used as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery project, during calendar year 2025. Notice 2026-1’s safe harbor applies if the US Environmental Protection Agency does not launch the electronic Greenhouse Gas Reporting Tool for filers to prepare and submit information required under subpart RR by June 10, 2026. Taxpayers can rely on the safe harbor to demonstrate compliance with subpart RR requirements when determining the Code Section 45Q credit related to the 2025 Calendar Year Secure Geological Storage.

December 19, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2026-6, extending the transition period in Revenue Ruling 2025-4 for states administering paid family and medical leave (PFML) programs and employers participating in PFML programs. The extension is for an additional year and only as it relates to the medical leave benefits a state pays to an individual that can be attributed to employer contributions.

December 22, 2025: The IRS issued Notice 2026-3, providing relief from Code Section 6654 and 6655 additions of tax for underpayments of estimated income tax by taxpayers making valid Code Section 1062(a) elections.

December 22, 2025: In Announcement 2026-1, the IRS declared its intent to issue guidance related to Code Section 6435. That guidance, intended for taxpayers that paid Code [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Potential refund opportunity of buyback excise tax based on § 4501 final regulations

Taxpayers who paid the stock repurchase excise tax based on prior guidance provided in Notice 2023-2 and the proposed regulations under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 4501 may be entitled to a refund based on changes made in the recently issued IRC § 4501 final regulations.

On November 21, 2025, the US Department of the Treasury (Treasury) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations under IRC § 4501, which took effect on November 24 and significantly narrowed the applicability of the stock repurchase excise tax compared to prior guidance provided in Notice 2023‑2 and the April 9, 2024, proposed regulations (collectively, the prior guidance). As a result, many transactions that were previously treated by the prior guidance as “repurchases” subject to the 1% stock repurchase excise tax are now no longer taxable. Taxpayers who paid the excise tax based on the prior guidance may be eligible for a refund.

The final regulations eliminated the prior guidance’s broad “funding rule,” which treated a US affiliate that was considered to have “funded” a foreign publicly traded parent (or its foreign affiliates), including via distributions or capital contributions, as having engaged in a covered stock repurchase. The final regulations also significantly narrowed the proposed regulations’ expansive treatment of transactions as “economically similar” to a stock repurchase by specifically excluding leveraged buyouts and other take-private transactions, complete liquidations, and tax-free acquisitive reorganizations under IRC § 368 from being subject to the excise tax. Moreover, the final regulations narrowed what qualifies as “stock” for IRC § 4501 purposes, specifically excluding certain preferred stock described in IRC § 1504(a)(4) (e.g., “plain vanilla” non-voting, non-participating preferred stock) and certain mandatorily redeemable or puttable stock issued before August 16, 2022 (i.e., the date of enactment of IRC § 4501).

The changes in the final regulations have potentially sweeping implications for taxpayers who paid the IRC § 4501 stock repurchase excise tax based on the prior guidance. The narrower scope of the applicability of stock repurchase excise tax under the final regulations creates a substantial opportunity to seek a refund of stock repurchase excise tax previously paid under the now-obsolete prior guidance.

To seek a refund, taxpayers should file Form 720-X, Amended Quarterly Federal Excise Tax Return, for each quarter they filed an original Form 720 reporting and paid the stock repurchase excise tax and attach a Form 7208 (with “Amended” at the top of each form) to each quarterly Form 720-X. Both Form 720-X and amended Form 7208 should be completed, and the excise tax recomputed, based on the final regulations. Because Form 720-X will serve as the taxpayer’s refund claim, it is critical that Form 720-X contains a detailed explanation of the legal basis for the adjustments to the original Forms 720 and 7208 to meet regulatory requirements imposed by the Treasury on refund claims. See Treas. Reg. § 301.6402-2 (setting forth the basic requirements for refund claims).

Taxpayers considering this refund opportunity should be aware that the statute of limitations deadline for filing a refund [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Major update: Potential refund opportunity for interest and penalty amounts accrued during COVID-19 federally declared disaster

The US Court of Federal Claims’ (CFC) recent decision in Kwong v. United States, No. 23-267 (Fed. Cl. Nov. 25, 2025), provides significant support for the potential refund opportunity we identified in a previous blog post titled, “Refund opportunity for interest and penalty amounts accrued during COVID-19 federally declared disaster.” The refund opportunity applies to taxpayers who made payments to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that included underpayment interest and/or failure-to-file/failure-to-pay penalties that accrued during all or part of the period from January 20, 2020, through July 10, 2023.

Although the CFC’s holding in Kwong addressed whether Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 7508A provided the taxpayer an extension of the two-year statute of limitations deadline for filing a refund suit (in IRC § 6532(a)) that fell after the COVID-19 disaster was declared, Kwong answered important questions for those taxpayers pursuing refunds for underpayment interest and/or failure-to-file/failure-to-pay penalties that accrued during COVID-19. The CFC held that the 2019 version of IRC § 7508A applies to the COVID-19 federally declared disaster. This is a significant holding because Congress amended IRC § 7508A in 2021 to significantly limit the IRC § 7508A(d) mandatory extension period. The CFC also held that the IRC § 7508A(d) mandatory extension period, as applied to the COVID-19 disaster, commenced on January 20, 2020, and ended on July 10, 2023.

Kwong has potentially sweeping implications for taxpayers who faced federal tax filing and/or payment deadlines that fell between January 20, 2020, and July 10, 2023. Under the CFC’s Kwong analysis, the deadline for payment of any federal tax falling between these two dates was extended to July 11, 2023. Since the IRS computes underpayment interest and/or failure-to-file/pay penalties from the payment due date, penalties should not accrue from January 20, 2020, through July 10, 2023, and any taxpayers who already paid these amounts may be entitled to a refund. The CFC’s analysis also does not rule out the possibility that taxpayers with payment due dates preceding January 20, 2020, may be entitled to relief to the extent the underpayment interest and/or failure-to-file/failure-to-pay penalties accrued during the COVID-19 disaster period.

As noted in our previous post, taxpayers considering this refund opportunity should be aware that the statute of limitations to file a refund claim expires three years from the filing deadline of the original tax return or two years from the date on which payment was made, whichever is later (unless the statute of limitations period was otherwise extended). This refund opportunity may apply to underpayment interest and/or penalties paid with respect to federal income, estate, gift, employment, or excise taxes.




read more

Potential Refund Opportunity for Interest and Penalty Amounts Accrued During COVID-19 Federally Declared Disaster

Taxpayers who made payments to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that included underpayment interest and/or failure-to-file/pay penalties that accrued during all or part of the period between January 20, 2020, through July 10, 2023, should consider filing a refund claim with the IRS to potentially recover accrued interest and penalty amounts.

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 7508A (as in effect during the COVID-19 pandemic), legislative history, regulations, and the US Tax Court’s opinion in Abdo v. Commissioner, 168 T.C. 148 (2024), provide the basis for potential refund claims. IRC § 7508A(d) provides for a mandatory postponement period of certain tax-related obligations, including the suspension of the accrual of underpayment interest for the duration of the COVID-19 incident period plus 60 days (January 20, 2020 – July 10, 2023). IRC § 7508A also appears to have paused the increase of failure-to-file/pay penalties, which are based on the time during which the taxpayer is not in compliance.

Taxpayers considering this refund opportunity should be aware that the statute of limitations to file a refund claim expires three years from the filing deadline of the original tax return or two years from the date on which payment was made – whichever is later (unless the statute of limitations period was otherwise extended). This refund opportunity may apply to underpayment interest and/or penalties paid with respect to federal income, estate, gift, employment, or excise taxes.




read more

Upcoming Webinar: Navigating IRS Tax Refunds

On April 9, 2025, join McDermott’s Tax Controversy & Litigation Group for an insightful webinar on the intricacies of claiming and collecting Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax refunds. This session is designed for tax professionals, legal practitioners, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of the IRS refund claims process and what to watch out for.

What You Will Learn:

  • Step-by-step guidance on filing IRS refund claims
  • Key legal considerations, insights, and traps surrounding refund claims
  • Strategies for effectively collecting refunds from the IRS
  • When and how to litigate refund claims

Click here for details and to register.




read more

FedEx Defeats Government’s Loper Bright Gambit

On February 13, 2025, a Tennessee federal district court handed FedEx Corporation its second win in a refund action involving the application of foreign tax credits to what are known as “offset earnings.”[1] Offset earnings are earnings from a taxpayer’s profitable related foreign corporations that are offset by losses from other related foreign corporations. FedEx previously prevailed on the question of whether it was entitled to foreign tax credits related to such earnings.[2] In this most recent ruling, the court rejected the Government’s reliance on a certain regulatory provision called the “Regulatory Haircut Rule”[3] to argue that the amount of FedEx’s claimed refund should be reduced. The case now appears to be set for appeal.

Revisiting the analysis in its first ruling, the court explained the error of the Government’s reliance upon the Regulatory Haircut Rule. In short, the court said that the rule’s application conflicted with the best construction of the governing statutes, primarily Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sections 960, 965(b)(4), and 965(g). The Government defended its reliance by appealing to Loper Bright’s instruction that courts must respect legitimate delegations of authority to an agency.[4] Citing IRC Section 965(o), which authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations “as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of” Section 965 and to “prevent the avoidance of the purposes” of this section, the Government argued that the Regulatory Haircut Rule furthered the IRC’s broader goal of preventing tax avoidance and that Loper Bright required the court to respect the Secretary’s exercise of his delegated authority.

While acknowledging that legitimate delegations of authority to agencies remain permissible after Loper Bright, the court reminded the Government that an agency does not have the power to regulate in a manner that is inconsistent with the statute, even when a delegation provision grants the agency broad discretionary authority:

Assuming that Congress delegated authority . . . to promulgate regulations implementing section 965 . . . that authority cannot, under Loper Bright, encompass the discretion to promulgate regulations that contravene the “single, best meaning” of section 965, as determined by the courts.[5]

In other words, a statute’s delegation provision should not be interpreted to allow Treasury to eliminate rules that Congress established in other parts of the IRC.

Practice Point: Referencing Loper Bright’s acknowledgment that Congress may “confer discretionary authority on agencies,”[6] the Government has defended (and likely will continue to defend) its regulations on the theory that its exercises of such authority should be respected. But as Loper Bright reminds us, courts have an independent duty to decide the meaning of statutory delegations. Thus, taxpayers should closely examine whether regulations purportedly derived from a statute’s delegation provision comport with the rest of the statute. Those that do not should be challenged.

______________________________________________________________________________

[1] FedEx Corp. & Subs. v. United States, No. 2:20-cv-02794 (W.D. Tenn., Feb. 13, 2025)(electronically available here).

[2] FedEx Corp. [...]

Continue Reading




read more

IRS Roundup January 20 – 31, 2025

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for the weeks of January 20, 2025 – January 24, 2025, and January 27, 2025 – January 31, 2025.

TAX-CONTROVERSY-RELATED DEVELOPMENTS

January 22, 2025: The IRS reminded taxpayers that they have rights – outlined in the Taxpayer Bill of Rights – any time they interact with the IRS. These rights cover a wide range of topics and issues and lay out what taxpayers can expect when interacting with the IRS. Taxpayers should also know that the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS that helps taxpayers and protects their rights for free. TAS can help if assistance is needed to resolve an IRS problem, if a problem is causing financial difficulty, or if an IRS system or procedure isn’t working as it should.

January 24, 2025: Alarm Concepts Inc. filed a class action lawsuit against the IRS and Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. after being notified that its tax data was stolen and leaked by Charles Littlejohn, a Booz Allen employee contracted to work at the IRS. Littlejohn pled guilty in October 2023 to unlawfully disclosing confidential tax returns and return information between 2018 and 2020. The breach appears to have affected tens of thousands of taxpayers.

The lawsuit alleges that the IRS failed to implement adequate cybersecurity measures despite repeated warnings, and that Booz Allen neglected to protect the data. The stolen information includes sensitive details from Forms 1099 and Schedule K-1. The lawsuit highlights ongoing risks of identity theft and fraud for the affected taxpayers.

The lawsuit asserts that Alarm Concepts and class members are entitled to statutory damages of $1,000 for each unauthorized inspection or disclosure, as well as punitive damages because the disclosures were willful or the result of gross negligence.

January 30, 2025: The US Senate Committee on Finance released a bipartisan discussion draft of legislation aimed at improving IRS procedures and administration. The proposed bill, named the Taxpayer Assistance Service Act (TAS Act), seeks to enhance the taxpayer experience by facilitating better communication with the IRS, streamlining tax compliance and dispute processes, and ensuring timely expert assistance. Key provisions include improving “math error” notices, expanding US Tax Court jurisdiction, simplifying foreign bank account report compliance, and expanding access to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals. The draft also aims to expand the independence of the National Taxpayer Advocate (NTA) from the IRS and strengthen the IRS whistleblower program while protecting the confidentiality of taxpayer information.

The proposed bill reflects nonpartisan recommendations and seeks to address challenges faced by taxpayers within the current tax system. Proponents of the proposed bill include the current NTA Erin Collins and the long-serving former NTA Nina Olson. Olson described the TAS Act as a “sweeping piece of legislation that promises to improve federal tax administration and increase taxpayer protections.”

TAX RETURN FILING SEASON DEVELOPMENTS

January [...]

Continue Reading




read more

IRS Roundup January 6 – 10, 2025

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for the week of January 6, 2025 – January 10, 2025.

January 6, 2025: The IRS released Internal Revenue Bulletin 2025-2, which includes Announcement 2025-2. The announcement states that, if finalized, certain portions of proposed regulations on required minimum distributions under Section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) will not apply before the 2026 distribution calendar year.

January 7, 2025: The IRS reminded taxpayers that final 2024 quarterly estimated tax payments are due January 15, 2025.

January 7, 2025: The IRS announced that the IRS Free File Guided Tax Software is now available through eight private-sector partners for taxpayers with adjusted gross income of $84,000 or less in 2024. One partner will offer a product in Spanish.

January 7, 2025: The IRS reminded taxpayers that IRS-certified volunteers are available to help qualified individuals file federal tax returns. Taxpayers can also sign up to volunteer with the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance or Tax Counseling for the Elderly programs.

January 8, 2025: National Taxpayer Advocate (NTA) Erin M. Collins released her 2024 Annual Report to Congress. The report identifies the 10 most serious problems involving taxpayers’ interactions with the IRS and makes administrative and legislative recommendations to address said problems. NTA Collins found overall improvement in the IRS’ service to taxpayers but also acknowledged persistent challenges, including delays in processing Employee Retention Credit claims and resolving Identity Theft Victim Assistance cases.

January 8, 2025: The IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2025-3, which addresses whether Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-600, as amended (Section 530) (addressing controversies involving whether individuals are employees for purposes of employment taxes), or the reduced rates of Code Section 3509 apply in five factual situations articulated in the ruling. The ruling also addresses whether the IRS will issue a notice of employment tax determination under Code Section 7436 in these same five situations.

The IRS also issued Revenue Procedure 2025-10 to provide updated guidance regarding the implementation of Section 530.

January 8, 2025: The IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2025-11, which provides the process under Code Section 48E(h) to apply for an allocation of capacity limitation as part of the Clean Electricity Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Amount Program for 2025 and subsequent years. Receipt of an allocation increases the amount of the clean electricity investment credit determined under Section 48E(a) for the taxable year in which the applicable facility, with which the allocation of capacity limitation is associated, is placed in service. The revenue procedure provides guidance regarding the application process, including application review, documentation requirements, and placed in service reporting requirements. It also provides information on requirements specific to the Additional Selection Criteria application options, including documentation submission requirements, and describes how the capacity limitation will be divided across the facility categories.

January 10, 2025: The [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Weekly IRS Roundup December 30, 2024 – January 3, 2025

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for the week of December 30, 2024 – January 3, 2025.

December 30, 2024: The IRS released Internal Revenue Bulletin 2025-1, which includes the following:

  • Revenue Procedure 2025-1, which contains the revised procedures for letter rulings and information letters issued by the different associate chief counsel offices. This revenue procedure also contains the revised procedures for determination letters issued by the Large Business and International Division, the Small Business/Self-Employed Division, the Wage and Investment Division, and the Tax Exempt and Government Entities (TE/GE) Division.
  • Revenue Procedure 2025-2, which explains when and how associate chief counsel offices should provide advice in technical advice memoranda (TAM) as well as taxpayers’ rights when a field office requests a TAM.
  • Revenue Procedure 2025-3, which provides a revised list of Internal Revenue Code (Code) areas under the jurisdiction of the following associate chief counsel offices: Corporate; Financial Institutions and Products; Income Tax and Accounting; Passthroughs and Special Industries; Procedure and Administration; and Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes. These relate to matters in which the IRS will not issue letter rulings or determination letters.
  • Revenue Procedure 2025-4, which provides guidance on the types of advice the IRS offers to taxpayers on issues under the jurisdiction of the IRS Commissioner, TE/GE Division, and Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements. It also details the procedures that apply to requests for determination letters and private letter rulings.
  • Revenue Procedure 2025-5, which provides the procedures for issuing determination letters on issues under the jurisdiction of the Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements. It also explains the procedures for issuing determination letters on tax-exempt statuses for organizations applying under Code Section 501 or 521, private foundation status, and other determinations related to tax-exempt organizations. Additionally, the revenue procedure applies to revocation or modification of determination letters and provides guidance on the exhaustion of administrative remedies for purposes of declaratory judgment under Code Section 7428.
  • Revenue Procedure 2025-7, which provides the areas under the jurisdiction of the associate chief counsel (international) in which letter rulings and determination letters will not be issued.

December 30, 2024: The IRS published Treasury Decision 10018, which contains final regulations regarding the filing of consolidated returns by affiliated corporations. They modify the consolidated return regulations to reflect statutory changes, update language to remove antiquated or regressive terminology, and enhance clarity. The IRS separately issued proposed regulations under which a transferee’s assumption of certain liabilities from a member of the same consolidated group will not reduce the transferor’s basis in the transferee’s stock received in the transfer.

December 30, 2024: The IRS published final regulations clarifying when tax-exempt bonds are considered retired for federal income tax purposes under Code Section 103. The regulations affect state and local governments issuing tax-exempt bonds [...]

Continue Reading




read more

Weekly IRS Roundup December 16 – December 20, 2024

Check out our summary of significant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) guidance and relevant tax matters for the week of December 16 – 20, 2024.

December 16, 2024: The IRS released Internal Revenue Bulletin 2024-51, which includes the following:

  • Treasury Decision 10009, which provides guidance regarding the advanced manufacturing investment credit under § 48D of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The guidance reflects changes made by the CHIPS Act of 2022. The § 48D credit may be claimed for qualified investments in an advanced manufacturing facility that engages in the manufacturing of semiconductors or semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
  • Treasury Decision 10010, which provides the rules for claiming the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit under Code § 45X. The regulations describe the requirements for the production of eligible components, including the domestic production requirement. The regulations also provide rules regarding the sale of eligible components to unrelated persons, as well as rules that apply to sales between related persons. They include definitions of eligible components, rules related to calculating the credit, and specific recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
  • Treasury Decision 10014, which finalizes 2013 proposed regulations under Code § 752, which relates to a partner’s share of a partnership recourse liability. The final regulations adopt a proportionality rule in instances where more than one partner bears the economic risk of loss of the partnership recourse debt. The regulations also provide guidance regarding how partnership recourse debt should be allocated in tiered partnership structures, as well as guidance on the related-party rules. Interestingly, no new notice of proposed rulemaking or opportunity for public comment was provided regarding these regulations in the 11 years since the 2013 proposed regulations were issued.
  • Revenue Ruling 2024-27, which publishes the base period T-bill rate for the period ending September 30, 2024, pursuant to Code § 995(f). The rate for this period is 4.93%.

The IRS also released Notice 2025-1, which provides guidance on the corporate bond monthly yield curve, the corresponding spot segment rates used under § 417(e)(3), the 24-month average segment rates used under § 430(h)(2), the interest rate on 30-year Treasury securities under § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) as in effect for plan years beginning before 2008, and the 30-year Treasury weighted average rate under § 431(c)(6)(E)(ii)(I) of the Code.

The IRS also issued Revenue Ruling 2025-1, which provides the January 2025 applicable federal rates for purposes of Code § 1274(d) and relates to the determination of issue price in the case of certain instruments issued for property.

December 17, 2024: The IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2025-8, which modifies the procedures under Code § 446 and Treasury Regulation § 1.446-1(e) for obtaining automatic consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) to change methods of accounting for expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021, to comply with § 174 or to rely on interim guidance provided in Notice 2023-63, 2023-39 I.R.B. 919, as modified by Notice 2024-12, 2024-5 I.R.B. 616.

December 18, 2024: In Notice 2025-4 the [...]

Continue Reading




read more

EDITOR IN CHIEF

STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

US Tax Disputes Firm of the Year 2025
2026 Best Law Firms - Law Firm of the Year (Tax Law)
jd supra readers choice top firm 2023 badge